bareMinerals
Mineralist Hydra Smoothing Lipstick, Focus
uncategorizedtypically $30–70
Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated
VMV Hypoallergenics
Velvet Matte Lipstick+57 on ingredient safety
$14
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 65-point gap between the two loudest voices.
25Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 9356 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
65 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Labor
raters agreeRun by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates bareMinerals as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust28 of 28 characterized
Our sources have reference data on all 28 listed ingredients.
Worth a look (8)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists →
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (20)
- RICINUS COMMUNIS SEED OIL
- DIISOSTEARYL MALATE
- ETHYLHEXYL OLIVATE
- OCTYLDODECANOL
- ORYZA SATIVA BRAN WAX
- EUPHORBIA CERIFERA WAX
- SILICA
- BUTYROSPERMUM PARKII BUTTER
- POLYGLYCERYL-2 TRIISOSTEARATE
- SIMMONDSIA CHINENSIS SEED OIL
- HIPPOPHAE RHAMNOIDES OIL
- PUNICA GRANATUM FLOWER EXTRACT
- GLYCERYL BEHENATE
- POLYESTER-1
- SILICA DIMETHYL SILYLATE
- SQUALANE
- TOCOPHEROL
- MICA
- IRON OXIDES
- YELLOW 6 LAKE
What these ingredient tags mean (1)
These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.
fragrance materialLINALOOL
- LINALOOL: A floral fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 84: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.