Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Lancôme/ARTLINER, Noir (2019 formulation)
L
Lancôme

ARTLINER, Noir (2019 formulation)

Eye Liner
Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick

Cleaner pick · Safest eyes we have rated

Revolution

Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick

+74 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 12541 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

47OUT OF 100Poor

range 40–66

26▲▼ split
Safety
86
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

71-point split

58

Scan

11

Precautionary

82

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

12541 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 77-point gap between the two loudest voices.

5ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
82Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 12541 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

77 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Lancôme as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·27 of 27 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 27 listed ingredients.

Worth a look (7)

  • Imidazolidinyl Urea8/10common irritantpreservativeraters disagree

    Carcinogen-linked · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • CI 778918/10colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • Methylparaben7/10preservative · fragranceraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

  • Propylparaben7/10preservative · perfumingraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 4 of 9 lists

  • Alcohol Denat6/10commonly dryingfragrance · antimicrobial · antifoamingraters disagree

    ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • Acrylates Copolymer4/10film forming · antistatic · bindingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • May Contain: CI 420904/10raters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (20)

  • Water
  • Propylene Glycolcommon irritant
  • Polyester-5
  • Trilaureth-4 Phosphate
  • Tin Oxide
  • Calcium Sodium Borosilicate
  • Silica
  • Xanthan Gum
  • Synthetic Fluorphlogopite
  • Sodium Dehydroacetate
  • CI 75470
  • CI 77007
  • CI 77163
  • CI 77288
  • CI 77400
  • CI 77491
  • CI 77492
  • CI 77499
  • CI 77510
  • Mica
What these ingredient tags mean (2)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

  • commonly dryingAlcohol Denat

    • Alcohol Denat: Denatured ethanol: a fast-evaporating solvent that thins a formula and leaves a dry finish. International Chemical Safety Card ICSC 0044, Ethanol (anhydrous), prepared by an international group of experts for the ILO and WHO: "The substance defats the skin, which may cause dryness or cracking." WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care (2009) records depletion of the skin lipid barrier by lipid-dissolving alcohols, and also that "the lipid-dissolving effect of alcohols is inversely related to their concentration". Both describe stronger exposures than a cosmetic formula.
  • common irritantPropylene Glycol, Imidazolidinyl Urea

    • Propylene Glycol: A solvent that shows up in patch-test clinics, more often as irritation than as allergy. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2018 (Jacob SE, Scheman A, McGowan MA, Dermatitis 2018;29(1):3-5).
    • Imidazolidinyl Urea: A preservative the FDA lists as a formaldehyde releaser, so formaldehyde-reactive skin can notice it. How much reaches the skin depends on the whole formula, not on this name alone. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex V entry 27, permits imidazolidinyl urea as a preservative up to 0,6%. The FDA names it among the "formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasing ingredients" on its Allergens in Cosmetics page (content current 25 February 2022). Annex V preamble point 2, as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/1181, requires the warning "releases formaldehyde" on any product whose total released formaldehyde exceeds 0,001% (10 ppm). That Regulation states the sensitisation ground itself, so the chain is drawn by the regulator and not by us: recital (2) names the class, "Certain of those preservatives are gradually releasing formaldehyde in order to fulfil a preserving function in the final cosmetic product (so called formaldehyde releasers)", and recital (3) gives the purpose of the warning, "In order to inform consumers sensitised to formaldehyde about the presence of formaldehyde that may trigger an allergic reaction". Recital (1) records that formaldehyde is classified a skin sensitizer (Category 1) in Part 3 of Annex VI to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008.