Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/L.A. Girl Cosmetics/L.A. Girl Pro.Conceal HD. high-definition Concealer, Chestnut
L.A. Girl Pro.Conceal HD. high-definition Concealer, Chestnut
L.A. Girl Cosmetics

L.A. Girl Pro.Conceal HD. high-definition Concealer, Chestnut

Concealer
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+77 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 18260 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

56OUT OF 100Fair

range 44–85

23▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
88
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

82-point split

46

Scan

0

Precautionary

82

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

18260 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 82-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
82Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 18260 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

82 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·24 of 25 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 24 of 25 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (7)

    • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • METHYLPARABEN7/10preservative · fragranceraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • ETHYLPARABEN7/10preservative · fragranceraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • BUTYLPARABEN7/10preservative · fragranceraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 4 of 9 lists

    • PROPYLPARABEN7/10preservative · perfumingraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 4 of 9 lists

    • CYCLOPENTASILOXANE4/10emollient · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

      Persistent / bioaccumulative · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (17)

    • WATER
    • BEESWAX
    • STEARYL DIMETHICONE
    • ISODODECANE
    • CETYL ETHYLHEXANOATE
    • MICROCRYSTALLINE WAX
    • CETYL PEG/PPG-10/1 DIMETHICONE
    • GLYCERYL LAURATE
    • POLYGLYCERYL-4 OLEATE
    • MICA
    • DISTEARDIMONIUM HECTORITE
    • TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
    • ASCORBYL PALMITATE
    • PROPYLENE GLYCOL
    • CHAMOMILLA RECUTITA EXTRACT
    • PROPYLENE CARBONATE
    • SODIUM HYALURONATE

    No data in our sources (1)

    • MAY CONTAIN / PEUT CONTENIR: IRON OXIDES

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.