Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Axe/Phoenix 2 in 1 Shampoo + Conditioner (2020 formulation)
Phoenix 2 in 1 Shampoo + Conditioner (2020 formulation)
Axe · owned by Unilever

Phoenix 2 in 1 Shampoo + Conditioner (2020 formulation)

Conditioner
Shampoo/Body Wash, Ginger-Orange (2019 formulation)

Cleaner pick · Safest multi-function cleansing we have rated

Healing-Scents

Shampoo/Body Wash, Ginger-Orange (2019 formulation)

+67 on ingredient safety

$12–30

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 725 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

61OUT OF 100Fair

range 41–89

33▲▼ split
Safety
90
Eco
59▲▼ split
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

79-point split

58

Scan

3

Precautionary

82

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

725 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 87-point gap between the two loudest voices.

3Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 725 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

87 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

✓US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 53% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

58 pts apart
  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Axe as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

10 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·19 of 19 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 19 listed ingredients.

Worth a look (10)

  • DMDM HYDANTOIN8/10preservativeraters disagree

    Carcinogen-linked · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • METHYLISOTHIAZOLINONE7/10preservativeraters disagree

    Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

  • COCAMIDOPROPYL BETAINE6/10antistatic · cleansing · hair conditioningraters disagree

    Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • FRAGRANCE6/10perfumingraters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • METHYLCHLOROISOTHIAZOLINONE6/10preservativeraters disagree

    Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • CARBOMER4/10emulsion stabilising · gel forming · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • CITRIC ACID4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

    Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • TEA-DODECYLBENZENESULFONATE4/10cleansing · foaming · surfactant - cleansingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • BLUE 14/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (9)

  • WATER
  • SODIUM LAURETH SULFATE
  • SODIUM CHLORIDE
  • DIMETHICONOL
  • PROPYLENE GLYCOL
  • GUAR HYDROXYPROPYLTRIMONIUM CHLORIDE
  • TETRASODIUM EDTA
  • PPG-9
  • MICA