Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/hue noir/Perfect Shine Hydrating Lip Gloss, (Clandestine Copper, Black Orchid, Maroon at Midnight, Bronze Bombshell, All that Glitters, Gold Diggin', Coming up Rose, Play Misty for Me) (2018 formulation)
Perfect Shine Hydrating Lip Gloss, (Clandestine Copper, Black Orchid, Maroon at Midnight, Bronze Bombshell, All that Glitters, Gold Diggin', Coming up Rose, Play Misty for Me) (2018 formulation)
hue noir

Perfect Shine Hydrating Lip Gloss, (Clandestine Copper, Black Orchid, Maroon at Midnight, Bronze Bombshell, All that Glitters, Gold Diggin', Coming up Rose, Play Misty for Me) (2018 formulation)

Lip Gloss

Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated

VMV Hypoallergenics

Velvet Matte Lipstick

+86 on ingredient safety

$14

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 12965 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

14OUT OF 100Horrible

Ingredient safety only

range 0–82

14▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

34-point split

0

Scan

0

Precautionary

34

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

12965 found

See better →

Flagged

14 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 82-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
82IARC MonographsGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 12965 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

82 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. This score changed Sep 1, 2026: source data updated. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    5 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·27 of 29 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 27 of 29 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (14)

    • Diazolidinyl Urea8/10common irritantpreservativeraters disagree

      Carcinogen-linked · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • CI 778918/10colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • Propylparaben7/10preservative · perfumingraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 4 of 9 lists →

    • Methylparaben7/10preservative · fragranceraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • Natural Flavor6/10raters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • CI 158504/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • CI 420904/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • CI 160354/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • CI 120854/10colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • CI 172004/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • CI 453804/10colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • CI 454104/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • CI 191404/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • CI 615704/10colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (13)

    • Simmondsia Chinensis
    • Ethylene/Propylene/Styrene Copolymer
    • Hydrogenated Polyisobutene
    • Alpha Tocopherol
    • Ricinus Communis
    • Propylene Glycolcommon irritant
    • Mica
    • CI 77489
    • CI 77491
    • CI 77492
    • CI 77499
    • CI 77742
    • CI 75470

    No data in our sources (2)

    • Butylene/Ethlyene/Styrene Copolymer
    • CI 77360

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (1)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • common irritantDiazolidinyl Urea, Propylene Glycol

      • Diazolidinyl Urea: A preservative the FDA lists as a formaldehyde releaser, so formaldehyde-reactive skin can notice it. How much reaches the skin depends on the whole formula, not on this name alone. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex V entry 46, permits diazolidinyl urea as a preservative up to 0,5%. The FDA names it among the "formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasing ingredients" on its Allergens in Cosmetics page (content current 25 February 2022). Annex V preamble point 2, as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/1181, requires the warning "releases formaldehyde" on any product whose total released formaldehyde exceeds 0,001% (10 ppm). That Regulation states the sensitisation ground itself, so the chain is drawn by the regulator and not by us: recital (2) names the class, "Certain of those preservatives are gradually releasing formaldehyde in order to fulfil a preserving function in the final cosmetic product (so called formaldehyde releasers)", and recital (3) gives the purpose of the warning, "In order to inform consumers sensitised to formaldehyde about the presence of formaldehyde that may trigger an allergic reaction". Recital (1) records that formaldehyde is classified a skin sensitizer (Category 1) in Part 3 of Annex VI to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008.
      • Propylene Glycol: A solvent that shows up in patch-test clinics, more often as irritation than as allergy. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2018 (Jacob SE, Scheman A, McGowan MA, Dermatitis 2018;29(1):3-5).