Anastasia Beverly Hills
Magic Touch Concealer, 13
Concealertypically $12–30
Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated
Tarte
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick+28 on ingredient safety, gives up 12 on labor practices
$38
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 28-point gap between the two loudest voices.
65IARC MonographsGovernment
vs93Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 7918 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
28 pts apartA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Labor
raters agreeRun by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust39 of 40 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 39 of 40 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (4)
IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A)flagged by 5 of 9 lists
Health Canada Hotlist — restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (35)
- AQUA/WATER/EAU
- BEHENYL DIMETHICONE
- BIS-STEARYL DIMETHICONE
- GLYCERIN
- CAPRYLYL METHICONE
- C12-15 ALKYL BENZOATE
- ETHYLHEXYL PALMITATE
- POLYGLYCERYL-4 ISOSTEARATE
- CETYL PEG/PPG-10/1 DIMETHICONE
- DIPHENYL DIMETHICONE
- DISTEARDIMONIUM HECTORITE
- ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE
- SODIUM CHLORIDE
- 1,2-HEXANEDIOL
- CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
- HELIANTHUS ANNUUS SEED OIL
- AMMONIUM GLYCYRRHIZATE
- DISODIUM EDTA
- SODIUM LAUROYL GLUTAMATE
- XANTHAN GUM
- LYSINE
- ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS LEAF EXTRACT
- TOCOPHEROL
- MAGNESIUM CHLORIDE
- LECITHIN
- ASCORBYL PALMITATE
- GLYCERYL STEARATE
- GLYCERYL OLEATE
- SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
- SODIUM HYALURONATE
- HYDROGEN DIMETHICONE
- METHICONE
- PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRA-DI-T-BUTYL HYDROXYHYDROCINNAMATE
- IRON OXIDES
- CHROMIUM OXIDE GREENS
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.