Bobbi Brown
SKIN FOUNDATION, SPF 15, Chestnut
uncategorized
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 43-point gap between the two loudest voices.
45ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs88Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientEvery rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
43 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust27 of 28 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 27 of 28 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (4)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists
Endocrine-activeflagged by 2 of 9 lists
IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A)flagged by 5 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (23)
- Methyl Trimethicone
- Neopentyl Glycol Diethylhexanoate
- Isononyl Isononanoate
- Glycerin
- Pentylene Glycol
- Lauryl Peg-9 Polydimethylsiloxyethyl Dimethicone
- Hdi/Trimethylol Hexyllactone Crosspolymer
- Boron Nitride
- Disteardimonium Hectorite
- Stearic Acid
- Palmitic Acid
- Dimethicone
- Lecithin
- Aluminum Dimyristate
- Tocopherol
- Myristic Acid
- Silica
- Magnesium Ascorbyl Phosphate
- Sodium Chloride
- Sodium Citrate
- Sorbic Acid
- Chlorphenesin
- Iron Oxides
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.