Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/100% PURE/Creamy Long Last Liner, Gleaming Pewter
Creamy Long Last Liner, Gleaming Pewter
100% PURE

Creamy Long Last Liner, Gleaming Pewter

Eye Linertypically $30–70

Your composite

93OUT OF 100Excellent

range 93–94

100
Safety
—
Eco
87
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

lenses agree

100

Scan

100

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

Nothing beats this on safety.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

raters agree

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors

✓US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 60% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    raters agree

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates 100% PURE as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    5 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·15 of 15 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 15 listed ingredients.

    ✓No flags in our sources (15)

    • Hydrogenated Jojoba Oil
    • Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride
    • Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil
    • Simmondsia Chinensis Seed Oil
    • Butyrospermum Parkii Butter
    • Canola Oil
    • Sclerocarya Birrea Seed Oil
    • Euphorbia Cerifera Wax
    • Glyceryl Caprylate
    • Copernicia Cerifera Wax
    • Tocopherol
    • Helianthus Annuus Seed Oil
    • Ascorbyl Palmitate
    • May contain: Iron Oxides
    • Mica

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from leapingbunny.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.