TruSkin
Depuffing Longevity Eye Cream
uncategorized
Cleaner pick · Safest eye care we have rated
bliss
Peek Performance Overnight Repair Eye Cream+12 on ingredient safety
$26
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
All 389 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
raters agreeA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · California Proposition 65 · ECHA SVHC Candidate List
Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 55% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.
Environmental
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates TruSkin as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
8 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust28 of 29 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 28 of 29 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (6)
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)flagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Health Canada Hotlist — restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (22)
- WATER
- COCONUT ALKANES
- CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE
- GLYCERINhumectant
- PRUNUS AMYGDALUS DULCIS OIL
- CETEARYL OLIVATE
- SORBITAN OLIVATE
- GLYCERYL STEARATES
- CETYL ALCOHOL
- PYRUS MALUS FRUIT EXTRACT
- BUTYROSPERMUM PARKII NUT EXTRACT
- VACCINIUM VITIS-IDAEA FRUIT EXTRACT
- BAKUCHIOL
- CETYL PALMITATE
- SORBITAN PALMITATE
- XANTHAN GUM
- TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
- ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
- COCO-CAPRYLATE/CAPRATE
- SODIUM BENZOATE
- GLUCONOLACTONE
- CALCIUM GLUCONATE
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
What these ingredient tags mean (1)
These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.
humectantGLYCERIN
- GLYCERIN: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from leapingbunny.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.