Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/L'Oréal/Age Perfect Radiant Satin Blush, 415 (2020 formulation)
Age Perfect Radiant Satin Blush, 415 (2020 formulation)
L'Oréal

Age Perfect Radiant Satin Blush, 415 (2020 formulation)

Blush
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+40 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 11950 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

45OUT OF 100Poor

range 39–60

60▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

20-point split

70

Scan

90

Precautionary

82

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

11950 found

See better →

Flagged

3 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 43-point gap between the two loudest voices.

47IARC MonographsGovernment
vs
90Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 11950 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

43 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates L'Oréal as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·22 of 23 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 22 of 23 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (3)

    • CI 77891/TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10raters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • TALC6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

      IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • CI 45410/RED 28 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (19)

    • COCOS NUCIFERA OIL/COCONUT OIL
    • ZEA MAYS STARCH/CORN STARCH
    • MAGNESIUM STEARATE
    • CALCIUM ALUMINUM BOROSILICATE
    • SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
    • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
    • ALUMINA
    • MANGIFERA INDICA SEED BUTTER/MANGO SEED BUTTER
    • THEOBROMA CACAO SEED BUTTER/COCOA SEED BUTTER
    • SILICA
    • CAMELLIA OLEIFERA SEED OIL
    • TIN OXIDE
    • TOCOPHEROL
    • MAY CONTAIN MICA
    • CI 77491
    • CI 77492
    • CI 77499/IRON OXIDES
    • CI 75470/CARMINE
    • CI 15985/YELLOW 6 LAKE

    No data in our sources (1)

    • CI 73360/RED 30

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.