e.l.f. Cosmetics, Inc.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Blemish Control Face Primer
Primer
Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated
Tarte
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick+28 on ingredient safety
$38
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 33-point gap between the two loudest voices.
65ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs98Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 7919 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
33 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates e.l.f. Cosmetics, Inc. as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
5 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust26 of 27 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 26 of 27 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (4)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 3 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (22)
- WATER
- HYDROGENATED POLYISOBUTENE
- DIMETHICONE
- BUTYLENE GLYCOL
- PROPYLENE GLYCOL
- MAGNESIUM ALUMINUM SILICATE
- CETEARYL ALCOHOL
- GLYCERYL STEARATE
- PEG-100 STEARATE
- C13-14 ISOPARAFFIN
- LAURETH-7
- VP/HEXADECENE COPOLYMER
- TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
- STEARIC ACID
- XANTHAN GUM
- SILICA
- DISODIUM EDTA
- PANTHENOL
- ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS EXTRACT
- THYMUS VULGARIS EXTRACT
- CITRUS LIMON PEEL EXTRACT
- CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from leapingbunny.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.