Lancôme
Blush Subtil Delicate Oil-Free Powder Blush - 351 Blushing Tresor Women 0.18 oz Blush
Blush
Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated
Tarte
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick+87 on ingredient safety
$38
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 80-point gap between the two loudest voices.
0Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs80ECHA SVHC Candidate ListGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 18580 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
80 pts apartA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens
Environmental
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
8 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Good36 of 48 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 36 of 48 listed ingredients; 12 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (20)
EU-prohibitedflagged by 4 of 9 lists
Endocrine-activeflagged by 3 of 9 lists
Endocrine-activeflagged by 4 of 9 lists
Endocrine-activeflagged by 3 of 9 lists
Endocrine-activeflagged by 4 of 9 lists
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 3 of 9 lists
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 2 of 9 lists
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 2 of 9 lists
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 2 of 9 lists
Persistent / bioaccumulativeflagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (16)
No data in our sources (12)
- CI 15850 \/ Red 7 Lake
- CI 16035 \/ Red 40 Lake
- CI 73360 \/ Red 30
- CI 75470 \/ Carmine
- CI 77007 \/ Ultramarines
- CI 77120 \/ Barium Sulfate
- CI 77163 \/ Bismuth Oxychloride
- CI 77499 \/ Iron Oxides
- CI 77510 \/ Ferric Ferrocyanide
- CI 77742 \/ Manganese Violet
- CI 77891 \/ Titanium Dioxide
- CI 77947 \/ Zinc Oxide
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.