Too Faced
Better Than Sex Mascara
uncategorized
Cleaner pick · Safest eyes we have rated
Revolution
Just Chillin' Cooling Shadow Stick+5 on ingredient safety
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.
Raters split
Labor
A 33-point gap between the two loudest voices.
55Cruelty-Free CertificationNonprofit
vs88Open Beauty Facts CertificationsNonprofit
050100
All 1285 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
raters agreeIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens
US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 51% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Labor
33 pts apartRun by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Too Faced as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust34 of 35 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 34 of 35 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (2)
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)flagged by 1 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (32)
- WATER AQUA EAU
- SYNTHETIC BEESWAX
- PARAFFIN
- GLYCERYL STEARATE
- ACACIA SENEGAL GUM
- BUTYLENE GLYCOL
- ORYZA SATIVA BRAN WAX
- STEARIC ACID
- PALMITIC ACID
- POLYBUTENE
- VP/EICOSENE COPOLYMER
- COPERNICIA CERIFERA WAX
- COPERNICIA CERIFERA CERA
- AMINOMETHYL PROPANOL
- GLYCERIN
- PVP
- ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
- HYDROXYETHYLCELLULOSE
- DISODIUM EDTA
- POLYESTER-11
- CELLULOSE
- TRIMETHYLPENTANEDIOL/ADIPIC ACID/GLYCERIN CROSSPOLYMER
- PROPYLENE GLYCOL
- DISODIUM PHOSPHATE
- POLYSORBATE 60
- ACACIA SEYAL GUM EXTRACT
- SODIUM PHOSPHATE
- ACETYL HEXAPEPTIDE-1
- DEXTRAN
- POTASSIUM SORBATE
- IRON OXIDES
- ULTRAMARINES
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.