Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Colourpop/Lippie Stix, After Shock
Lippie Stix, After Shock
Colourpop

Lippie Stix, After Shock

uncategorizedtypically under $12

Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated

VMV Hypoallergenics

Velvet Matte Lipstick

+47 on ingredient safety

$14

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 6743 cleaner options →2 in this price band or under

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

65OUT OF 100Fair

range 61–75

53▲▼ split
Safety
56
Eco
87
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

40-point split

58

Scan

42

Precautionary

82

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

6743 found

See better →

Flagged

8 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 40-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
82IARC MonographsGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 6743 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

40 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · California Proposition 65

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

raters agree
  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Colourpop as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

9 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·27 of 29 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 27 of 29 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (8)

  • titanium dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

  • flavor6/10flavouring agent · fragrance ingredientraters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • cyclopentasiloxane4/10emollient · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

    Persistent / bioaccumulative · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • cyclohexasiloxane4/10emollient · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

    Persistent / bioaccumulative · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • polyethylene4/10film forming · abrasive · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • methyl methacrylate crosspolymer4/10film formingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • blue 1 lake4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • red 7 lake4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

✓No flags in our sources (19)

  • caprylyl methicone
  • stearyl methicone
  • phenyl trimethicone
  • trimethylsiloxysilicate
  • lauryl laurate
  • microcrystalline wax
  • synthetic beeswax
  • paraffin
  • mangifera indica seed butter
  • butyrospermum parkii
  • tocopherol
  • glycerinhumectant
  • persea gratissima oil
  • hydrogenated vegetable oil
  • glycine soja oil
  • hydrogenated lecithin
  • palmitic acid
  • betaine
  • iron oxides

No data in our sources (2)

  • c12-16 alcohol
  • momordica grosvenori fruit extract

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (1)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

  • humectantglycerin

    • glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.