Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Lip Smacker/Lip Balm, White Chocolate Bunny, Frosted Carrot Cake Butterscotch Basket
Lip Balm, White Chocolate Bunny, Frosted Carrot Cake Butterscotch Basket
Lip Smacker

Lip Balm, White Chocolate Bunny, Frosted Carrot Cake Butterscotch Basket

Lip Balm
Grapefruit & Currant Thinkdaily Lip Balm

Cleaner pick · Safest lip care we have rated

Thinkbaby

Grapefruit & Currant Thinkdaily Lip Balm

+47 on ingredient safety

$3.49

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 2625 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

69OUT OF 100Fair

range 62–88

53▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
85
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

32-point split

38

Scan

42

Precautionary

70

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

2625 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 52-point gap between the two loudest voices.

38Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 2625 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

52 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Lip Smacker as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·27 of 29 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 27 of 29 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (9)

    • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • FLAVOR/AROMA6/10raters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • PROPYL GALLATE6/10perfuming · antioxidantraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • CITRIC ACID4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • YELLOW 5 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • RED 27 LAKE4/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • RED 64/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • RED 7 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (18)

    • RICINUS COMMUNIS SEED OIL
    • CETYL ACETATE
    • EUPHORBIA CERIFERA WAX/CIRE DE CANDELILLA
    • POLYBUTENE
    • PARAFFIN
    • SESAMUM INDICUM SEED OIL
    • COPERNICIA CERIFERA WAX/CIRE DE CARNAUBA
    • HYDROGENATED SOYBEAN OIL
    • MINERAL OIL/HUILE MIN RALE
    • ACETYLATED LANOLIN ALCOHOL
    • MICROCRYSTALLINE WAX/CIRE MICROCRISTALLINE
    • TRITICUM VULGARE GERM OIL
    • STEARIC ACID
    • SUCRALOSE
    • PROPYLENE GLYCOL
    • TOCOPHEROL
    • IRON OXIDES
    • YELLOW 6 LAKE

    No data in our sources (2)

    • BEESWAX/CIRE D'ABEILLE
    • MAY CONTAIN/PEUT CONTENIR: BLUE 1 LAKE

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.