Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Alberto/V05 Men 3 In1 Body Wash Shampoo Conditioner, Ocean Surge
V05 Men 3 In1 Body Wash Shampoo Conditioner, Ocean Surge
Alberto

V05 Men 3 In1 Body Wash Shampoo Conditioner, Ocean Surge

Conditioner
Shampoo/Body Wash, Ginger-Orange (2019 formulation)

Cleaner pick · Safest multi-function cleansing we have rated

Healing-Scents

Shampoo/Body Wash, Ginger-Orange (2019 formulation)

+76 on ingredient safety

$12–30

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 792 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

24OUT OF 100Horrible

Ingredient safety only

range 0–90

24▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

42-point split

0

Scan

42

Precautionary

25

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

792 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 90-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 792 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

90 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: IARC Monographs · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

✓US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 54% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·27 of 28 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 27 of 28 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (11)

    • VIOLET 28/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • METHYLISOTHIAZOLINONE7/10preservativeraters disagree

      Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • COCAMIDOPROPYL BETAINE6/10antistatic · cleansing · hair conditioningraters disagree

      Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • FRAGRANCE6/10perfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • METHYLCHLOROISOTHIAZOLINONE6/10preservativeraters disagree

      Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • ASCORBIC ACID6/10fragrance · antioxidant · bufferingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • SODIUM LAURYL SULFATE4/10cleansing · denaturant · foamingraters disagree

      Transparency concern · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • POLYQUATERNIUM-74/10film forming · antistaticraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • CITRIC ACID4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • BLUE 14/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • ORANGE 44/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (16)

    • WATER
    • SODIUM LAURETH SULFATE
    • SODIUM CHLORIDE
    • GLYCERIN
    • SODIUM BENZOATE
    • DISODIUM EDTA
    • POLYSORBATE 20
    • HELIANTHUS ANNUUS SEED OIL
    • MANGIFERA INDICA SEED OIL
    • PRUNUS AMYGDALUS DULCIS OIL
    • ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS LEAF OIL
    • ANTHEMIS NOBILIS FLOWER OIL
    • PANTHENOL
    • TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
    • BIOTIN
    • NIACINAMIDE

    No data in our sources (1)

    • EXT

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.