Anastasia Beverly Hills
Liquid Lipstick, Tulip
uncategorizedtypically $12–30
Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated
VMV Hypoallergenics
Velvet Matte Lipstick+69 on ingredient safety
$14
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 83-point gap between the two loudest voices.
15Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs98Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 9531 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
83 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Environmental
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Labor
raters agreeRun by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Anastasia Beverly Hills as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
6 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust22 of 24 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 22 of 24 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (6)
EU-prohibitedflagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (16)
- ISODODECANE
- TRIMETHYLSILOXYSILICATE
- BORON NITRIDE
- OZOKERITE
- MINERAL OIL/PARAFFINUM LIQUIDUM/HUILE MINERALE
- DISTEARDIMONIUM HECTORITE
- BUTYLENE/ETHYLENE/STYRENE COPOLYMER
- ETHYLENE/PROPYLENE/STYRENE COPOLYMER
- ISOHEXADECANE
- PROPYLENE CARBONATE
- SODIUM HYALURONATE
- SODIUM MAGNESIUM SILVER PHOSPHATE
- TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
- TRIPEPTIDE-1
- XANTHAN GUM
- IRON OXIDES
No data in our sources (2)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.