Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Townley/Disney Frozen Lip Gloss, Cotton Candy Flavored (2019 formulation)
Disney Frozen Lip Gloss, Cotton Candy Flavored (2019 formulation)
Townley

Disney Frozen Lip Gloss, Cotton Candy Flavored (2019 formulation)

Lip Gloss

Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated

VMV Hypoallergenics

Velvet Matte Lipstick

+85 on ingredient safety

$14

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 12930 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

60OUT OF 100Fair

range 55–83

15▲▼ split
Safety
78
Eco
88
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

52-point split

0

Scan

13

Precautionary

52

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

12930 found

See better →

Flagged

12 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 82-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
82IARC MonographsGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 12930 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

82 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·26 of 26 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 26 listed ingredients.

Worth a look (12)

  • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

  • METHYLPARABEN7/10preservative · fragranceraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

  • PROPYLPARABEN7/10preservative · perfumingraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 4 of 9 lists →

  • BHT7/10fragrance · antioxidantraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

  • FRAGRANCE6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfumingraters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE4/10film formingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • RED 7 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • BLUE 1 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • RED 6 LAKE4/10colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • YELLOW 5 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • RED 27 LAKE4/10raters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • RED 28 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

✓No flags in our sources (14)

  • MINERAL OILrich occlusive
  • POLYBUTENE
  • SILICA DIMETHYL SILYLATE
  • ETHYLHEXYL PALMITATE
  • CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE
  • HYDROXYSTEARIC ACID
  • MICROCRYSTALLINE WAX
  • OZOKERITE
  • GLYCERINhumectant
  • SODIUM SACCHARIN
  • MAY CONTAIN: MICA
  • YELLOW 10 LAKE
  • IRON OXIDES
  • YELLOW 6 LAKE
What these ingredient tags mean (3)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

  • undeclared fragrance blendFRAGRANCE

    • FRAGRANCE: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.
  • rich occlusiveMINERAL OIL

    • MINERAL OIL: A refined oil that sits on the surface of the skin; it has a heavy finish. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(l): "Mineral oil, 50 to 100 percent; 30 to 35 percent in combination with colloidal oatmeal in accordance with 347.20(a)(4)."
  • humectantGLYCERIN

    • GLYCERIN: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".