Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Clinique/Chubby Stick Cheek Colour Balm, Plumped Up Peony 04
Chubby Stick Cheek Colour Balm, Plumped Up Peony 04
Clinique

Chubby Stick Cheek Colour Balm, Plumped Up Peony 04

Blush

Clinique

Chubby Stick Cheek Colour Balm, Plumped Up Peony 04

Blush

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

45OUT OF 100Poor

range 36–68

—
Pkg

Why this score

95-point split

0

Scan

95

Precautionary

20

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

3126 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 95-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
95Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 3126 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

95 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·43 of 47 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 43 of 47 listed ingredients; 4 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (7)

  • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • RED 22 LAKE8/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • POLYETHYLENE4/10film forming · abrasive · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • YELLOW 5 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • BLUE 1 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • RED 64/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • RED 28 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (36)

  • ISODECYL ISONONANOATE
  • PROPYLENE GLYCOL DICAPRYLATE/DICAPRATE
  • HDI/TRIMETHYLOL HEXYLLACTONE CROSSPOLYMER
  • BIS-DIGLYCERYL POLYACYLADIPATE-2
  • DIISOPROPYL DIMER DILINOLEATE
  • OZOKERITE
  • SQUALANE
  • CERESIN
  • HYDROGENATED POLYISOBUTENE
  • SILICA
  • OCTYLDODECANOL
  • PHYTOSTERYL ISOSTEARATE
  • ORYZANOL
  • TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
  • LAUROYL LYSINE
  • LECITHIN
  • SYNTHETIC BEESWAX
  • LAURYL PCA
  • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
  • ETHYLENE/PROPYLENE/STYRENE COPOLYMER
  • PROPYLENE CARBONATE
  • DISTEARDIMONIUM HECTORITE
  • TIN OXIDE
  • BUTYLENE/ETHYLENE/STYRENE COPOLYMER
  • ALUMINA
  • SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
  • MICA
  • IRON OXIDES
  • RED 7 LAKE
  • CARMINE
  • MANGANESE VIOLET
  • FERRIC FERROCYANIDE
  • CHROMIUM OXIDE GREENS
  • BISMUTH OXYCHLORIDE
  • ULTRAMARINES
  • YELLOW 6 LAKE

No data in our sources (4)

  • EUPHORBIA CERIFERA WAXCANDELILLA CERACIRE DE CANDELILLA
  • RED 30 LAKE
  • CHROMIUM HYDROXIDE GREEN
  • RED 33 LAKE

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfreekitty.com ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.