Anastasia Beverly Hills
Liquid Lipsticks, Grim
uncategorizedtypically $12–30
Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated
VMV Hypoallergenics
Velvet Matte Lipstick+40 on ingredient safety
$14
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 32-point gap between the two loudest voices.
50Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs82IARC MonographsGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 3938 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
32 pts apartA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens
Environmental
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Labor
raters agreeRun by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Anastasia Beverly Hills as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
9 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust22 of 23 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 22 of 23 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (7)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists →
Persistent / bioaccumulativeflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (15)
- ISODODECANE
- TRIMETHYLSILOXYSILICATE
- BORON NITRIDE
- MINERAL OIL/PARAFFINUM LIQUIDUM/HUILE MINERALE
- DIMETHICONE/VINYL DIMETHICONE CROSSPOLYMER
- DISTEARDIMONIUM HECTORITE
- SILICA DIMETHYL SILYLATE
- BUTYLENE/ETHYLENE/STYRENE COPOLYMER
- ETHYLENE/PROPYLENE/STYRENE COPOLYMER
- ISOCETETH-10
- PROPYLENE CARBONATE
- SILICA
- SODIUM MAGNESIUM SILVER PHOSPHATE
- TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
- IRON OXIDES
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.