Naturium
Retinol Complex Cream
uncategorized
Cleaner pick · Safest treatments we have rated
badgerbalm
Tattoo Balm+24 on ingredient safety, gives up 7 on labor practices
$13.99
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 33-point gap between the two loudest voices.
65California Proposition 65Government
vs98Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 595 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
33 pts apartA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · IARC Monographs · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens
US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 57% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Naturium as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust41 of 42 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 41 of 42 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (2)
Prop 65-listedflagged by 4 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (39)
- Water
- Glycerin
- Butyrospermum Parkii Butter
- Dimethicone
- Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride
- Astrocaryum Murumuru Seed Butter
- Squalane
- Gossypium Herbaceum Seed Oil
- Bakuchiol
- Ethylhexyl Olivate
- Phytosteryl/Octyldodecyl Lauroyl Glutamate
- Sodium Acrylates Copolymer
- Hydroxyacetophenone
- Polyacrylate Crosspolymer-6
- Bidens Pilosa Extract
- Sodium Hyaluronate
- Lecithin
- Glyceryl Polyacrylate
- Linum Usitatissimum Seed Oil
- Glyceryl Behenate
- Linoleic Acid
- Potassium Sorbate
- Phytosteryl Canola Glycerides
- Caprylyl Glycol
- Copernicia Cerifera Wax
- Hexylene Glycol
- Oleic Acid
- Palmitic Acid
- Helianthus Annuus Seed Oil
- Polysorbate 20
- Propanediol
- Tocopherol
- Stearic Acid
- Tocopheryl Acetate
- Triolein
- 1,2-Hexanediol
- Disodium Cocoamphodiacetate
- Xanthan Gum
- Ethyl Ferulate
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from leapingbunny.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.