Black Radiance
Color Perfect Liquid Makeup
uncategorized
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 47-point gap between the two loudest voices.
47IARC MonographsGovernment
vs94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientEvery rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
47 pts apartA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors
Environmental
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Labor
raters agreeRun by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
10 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Good24 of 31 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 24 of 31 listed ingredients; 7 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (5)
Strong contact sensitizerflagged by 3 of 9 lists
IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A)flagged by 5 of 9 lists
Persistent / bioaccumulativeflagged by 1 of 9 lists
IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)flagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (19)
- Water
- Glyceryl Stearate
- Isododecane
- Isostearyl Neopentanoate
- Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride
- Cetyl PEG/PPG-10/1 Dimethicone
- Hexyl Laurate
- Polyglyceryl-4 Isostearate
- Aluminum Starch Octenylsuccinate
- Magnesium Aluminum Silicate
- Cellulose Gum
- Disodium Stearoyl Glutamate
- Chlorphenesin
- Disteardimonium Hectorite
- Phospholipids
- Disodium EDTA
- Trisodium EDTA
- Cl 77492
- Cl 77499
No data in our sources (7)
- Triethanolamme
- Chamomila Recutita Flower Extract
- Oenethoera Biennis Oil
- Chromium Hydroxide Green/CL 77289
- Iron Oxides/Cl 77491
- Titanium Dioxide/Cl 77891
- Ultramarines/Cl 77007]. 1211
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.