hover a pillar to set the scene →
Cleaner options
See 44 cleaner alternatives
Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors
US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 55% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
5 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Robust21 of 22 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 21 of 22 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (4)
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists
IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)flagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (17)
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.