Hard Candy
Glosstopia Ultimate Lip Shine, Frostease 1784 (2020 formulation)
Lip Gloss
Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated
VMV Hypoallergenics
Velvet Matte Lipstick+49 on ingredient safety
$14
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 40-point gap between the two loudest voices.
42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs82Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 7589 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
40 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Environmental
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Hard Candy as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
5 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Good21 of 27 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 21 of 27 listed ingredients; 6 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (5)
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (16)
- OCTYLDODECANOL
- BIS-DIGLYCERYL POLYACYLADIPATE-2
- CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE
- MICROCRYSTALLINE WAX
- SILICA DIMETHYL SILYLATE
- BUTYROSPERMUM PARKII BUTTER
- MICA
- CALCIUM TITANIUM BOROSILICATE
- CALCIUM SODIUM BOROSILICATE
- SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
- RICINUS COMMUNIS SEED OIL
- GLYCERYL CAPRYLATE
- CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
- SACCHARINfragrance material
- HYDROGENATED CASTOR OIL
- IRON OXIDES (CI 77491
No data in our sources (6)
- INGR DIENTS: HYDROGENATED POLYISOBUTENE
- VP/EICOSENE COPOLYMER VP/HEXADECENE COPOLYMER
- SODIUM HYALURONATE SORBITAN OLEATE
- TIN OXIDE MAY CONTAIN / PEUT CONTAINER
- 77492
- 77499)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.