Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Markwins/Highlight & Bronze Palette, Cha Cha Chocolate (2020 formulation)
Highlight & Bronze Palette, Cha Cha Chocolate (2020 formulation)
Markwins

Highlight & Bronze Palette, Cha Cha Chocolate (2020 formulation)

Bronzer Highlighter
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+52 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 15020 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

63OUT OF 100Fair

range 54–86

48▲▼ split
Safety
78
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

63-point split

30

Scan

93

Precautionary

58

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

15020 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 63-point gap between the two loudest voices.

30Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
93Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 15020 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

63 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·27 of 31 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 27 of 31 listed ingredients; 4 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (9)

  • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • POLYETHYLENE4/10film forming · abrasive · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • BLUE 1 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • RED 6 LAKE4/10colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • RED 7 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • RED 28 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • RED 40 LAKE4/10raters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • YELLOW 5 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (18)

  • MAGNESIUM STEARATE
  • DIMETHICONE
  • SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
  • ISOPROPYL MYRISTATE
  • SILICA
  • ZEA MAYS STARCH
  • MINERAL OIL
  • POLYBUTENE
  • ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
  • MICA
  • CARMINE
  • CHROMIUM HYDROXIDE GREEN (CI 77289
  • CHROMIUM OXIDE GREENS
  • IRON OXIDES (CI 77491
  • CI 77492
  • CI 77499)
  • ULTRAMARINES
  • CHROMIUM HYDROXIDE GREEN

No data in our sources (4)

  • BRONZE - INGREDIENTS: TALC
  • YELLOW 5 LAKE HIGHLIGHT - INGREDIENTS: TALC
  • MICA +/- : BLUE 1 LAKE
  • RED 7 LAKE (CI 15850

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.