Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Too Faced/Just Peachy Mattes, Fresh-Picked (2018 formulation)
Too Faced

Just Peachy Mattes, Fresh-Picked (2018 formulation)

uncategorized

Too Faced

Just Peachy Mattes, Fresh-Picked (2018 formulation)

uncategorized

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

64OUT OF 100Fair

range 49–91

—
Eco
—
Pkg

Why this score

52-point split

62

Scan

42

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No category on file, so no fair comparison.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 52-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

52 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    33 pts apart
    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·25 of 26 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 25 of 26 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (4)

    • Talc6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

      IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • Benzyl Benzoate6/10perfuming · antimicrobial · solventraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Fragrance/Parfum6/10perfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (21)

    • Oryza Sativa Extract/Oryza Sativa Extract
    • Ethylene/Acrylic Acid Copolymer
    • Mica
    • Lauroyl Lysine
    • Zinc Stearate
    • Aluminum Dimyristate
    • Aqua/Water/Eau
    • Disodium Stearoyl Glutamate
    • Ficus Carica Fruit Extract/Ficus Carica Fruit Extract
    • Glycerin
    • Poloxamer 338
    • Potassium Sorbate
    • Propylene Glycol Dicaprylate/Dicaprate
    • Prunus Persica Fruit Extract/Prunus Persica Fruit Extract
    • Silica
    • Sodium Dehydroacetate
    • Sorbic Acid
    • Triethoxycaprylylsilane
    • Xanthan Gum
    • Carmine
    • Manganese Violet

    No data in our sources (1)

    • MAY CONTAIN/PEUT CONTENIR : Iron Oxides

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.