Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Colourpop/Super Shock Shadow, On Set
Super Shock Shadow, On Set
Colourpop

Super Shock Shadow, On Set

Eye Shadowtypically under $12
Liquid Mineral Eyeliner

Cleaner pick · Safest eyes we have rated

Mineral Fusion

Liquid Mineral Eyeliner

+35 on ingredient safety, gives up 5 on labor practices

0.1oz · $17.99 · $179.90/oz

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 7324 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

75OUT OF 100Good

range 73–81

65
Safety
—
Eco
85
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

16-point split

60

Scan

65

Precautionary

76

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

7324 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

All 7324 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

raters agree
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·39 of 41 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 39 of 41 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (8)

    • titanium dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • cyclopentasiloxane4/10emollient · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

      Persistent / bioaccumulative · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • cyclohexasiloxane4/10emollient · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

      Persistent / bioaccumulative · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • black 24/10colorantraters disagree

      IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • blue 1 lake4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • red 40 lake4/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • yellow 5 lake4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (31)

    • dimethicone
    • calcium sodium borosilicate
    • synthetic fluorphlogopite
    • calcium aluminum borosilicate
    • alumina
    • trimethylsiloxysilicate
    • aluminum calcium sodium silicate
    • isododecane
    • boron nitride
    • silica
    • c30-45 alkyl cetearyl dimethicone crosspolymer
    • dimethicone/vinyltrimethylsiloxysilicate crosspolymer
    • disteardimonium hectorite
    • tin oxide
    • glycine soja oil
    • mangifera indica seed butter
    • propylene carbonate
    • ethylhexylglycerin
    • cucumis sativus fruit extract
    • triethoxycaprylylsilane
    • hydrogenated polyisobutene
    • palmitic acid
    • may contain: aluminum powder
    • bismuth oxychloride
    • chromium hydroxide green
    • chromium oxide greens
    • ferric ferrocyanide
    • iron oxides
    • manganese violet
    • mica
    • ultramarines

    No data in our sources (2)

    • bronze powder
    • copper powder

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.