Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Anastasia Beverly Hills/Loose Glitter, Pink Sapphire (2019 formulation)
Loose Glitter, Pink Sapphire (2019 formulation)
Anastasia Beverly Hills

Loose Glitter, Pink Sapphire (2019 formulation)

Glittertypically $12–30
Pressed Glitter, Hungry Ghost

Cleaner pick · Safest glitter we have rated

Colourpop

Pressed Glitter, Hungry Ghost

+5 on ingredient safety

under $12

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 21 cleaner options →6 in this price band or under

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Anastasia Beverly Hills

Loose Glitter, Pink Sapphire (2019 formulation)

Glitter

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

80OUT OF 100Good

range 78–81

—
Pkg

Why this score

10-point split

90

Scan

100

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

21 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

All 21 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

raters agree

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · IARC Monographs · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

5 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·6 of 6 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 6 listed ingredients.

Worth a look (3)

  • Polyethylene Terephthalate4/10film formingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • Polymethyl Methacrylate4/10film formingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • May Contain: Red 74/10raters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (3)

  • Polyurethane-33
  • Polyurethane-11
  • Aluminum Powder

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.