Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Australian Gold/Sunscreen Spray Gel with Instant Bronzer, SPF 4
Sunscreen Spray Gel with Instant Bronzer, SPF 4
Australian Gold

Sunscreen Spray Gel with Instant Bronzer, SPF 4

Sun Care
Browning Lotion

Cleaner pick · Safest self-tan we have rated

Poofy Organics

Browning Lotion

+54 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 298 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

67OUT OF 100Fair

range 57–89

46▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
88
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

54-point split

62

Scan

34

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

298 found

See better →

Flagged

9 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 65-point gap between the two loudest voices.

25ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 298 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

65 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·29 of 29 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 29 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (9)

    • triethanolamine8/10fragrance · buffering · surfactant - cleansingraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • oxybenzone7/10raters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 4 of 9 lists →

    • methylisothiazolinone7/10common irritantpreservativeraters disagree

      Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

    • octocrylene6/10uv filter · uv absorber · light stabilizerraters disagree

      Strong contact sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • fragrance6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • sorbitan oleate6/10surfactant - emulsifyingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • aloe barbadensis leaf juice4/10skin conditioningraters disagree

      IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • melaleuca alternifolia leaf oil4/10common irritantfragrance materialperfuming · antioxidantraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (20)

    • avobenzone
    • acrylates/c10-30 alkyl acrylate crosspolymer
    • acrylates/c12-22 alkyl methacrylate copolymer
    • butylphthalimide
    • c12-15 alkyl benzoate
    • caramelfragrance material
    • dimethiconerich occlusive
    • disodium edta
    • glycerinhumectant
    • helianthus annuus seed oil
    • hydroxypropyl methylcellulose
    • isopropylphthalimide
    • olea europaea fruit oil
    • oleth 10
    • polysilicone-15
    • propylene glycolcommon irritant
    • terminalia ferdinandiana fruit extract
    • tocopheryl acetate
    • trimethylsiloxysilicate
    • water
    What these ingredient tags mean (4)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • common irritantmelaleuca alternifolia leaf oil, methylisothiazolinone, propylene glycol

      • melaleuca alternifolia leaf oil: An essential oil whose oxidation products carry its sensitising potential; the EU assesses it as a moderate skin sensitiser. SCCS Scientific Opinion on Tea Tree Oil (CAS/EC 68647-73-4 / 285-377-1), SCCS/1681/25, adopted 30 October 2025, which concludes it is a moderate skin sensitiser. It does not set maximum levels of its own: it assesses the concentrations the applicant defended, and finds no concern at 2,0% in shampoo, 1,0% in shower gel, 1,0% in face wash and 0,1% in face cream, for oil conforming to ISO 4730:2017, in adults, in non-sprayable formats. It draws on the earlier SCCP opinions SCCP/1155/08 and SCCP/0843/04 and incorporates their data by reference; it says nothing about their status.
      • methylisothiazolinone: A preservative that patch-test clinics see reactions to often enough that the EU banned it from leave-on products. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2013 (Castanedo-Tardana MP, Zug KA, Dermatitis 2013;24(1):2-6); SCCS Opinion on Methylisothiazolinone (P94), Submission II, SENSITISATION ONLY (SCCS/1521/13, revision of 27 March 2014); banned in leave-on cosmetics by Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1198, which recites the need to address "the increased incidence of allergies induced by methylisothiazolinone".
      • propylene glycol: A solvent that shows up in patch-test clinics, more often as irritation than as allergy. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2018 (Jacob SE, Scheman A, McGowan MA, Dermatitis 2018;29(1):3-5).
    • undeclared fragrance blendfragrance

      • fragrance: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.
    • rich occlusivedimethicone

      • dimethicone: A silicone that forms a film on the surface of the skin without an oily feel. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(g), lists dimethicone as a skin protectant at 1 to 30%.
    • humectantglycerin

      • glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".