Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/CoverGirl/Eye Enhancers 3 Kit Eye Shadow, Shimmering Sands 110
Eye Enhancers 3 Kit Eye Shadow, Shimmering Sands 110
CoverGirl

Eye Enhancers 3 Kit Eye Shadow, Shimmering Sands 110

Eye Shadow
Liquid Mineral Eyeliner

Cleaner pick · Safest eyes we have rated

Mineral Fusion

Liquid Mineral Eyeliner

+40 on ingredient safety

0.1oz · $17.99 · $179.90/oz

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 8411 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

58OUT OF 100Fair

range 53–72

60▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
55
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

37-point split

68

Scan

51

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

8411 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 37-point gap between the two loudest voices.

51Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
88Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 8411 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

37 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·12 of 13 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 12 of 13 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (3)

    • METHYLPARABEN7/10preservative · fragranceraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • PROPYLPARABEN7/10preservative · perfumingraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 4 of 9 lists

    • TALC6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

      IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (9)

    • MICA
    • ZINC STEARATE
    • ETHYLHEXYL PALMITATE
    • DIMETHICONE
    • BORON NITRIDE
    • CALCIUM SILICATE
    • SODIUM DEHYDROACETATE
    • BISMUTH OXYCHLORIDE
    • IRON OXIDES

    No data in our sources (1)

    • TIN OXIDE MAY CONTAIN/PEUT CONTENIR/+/-:TITANIUM DIOXIDE

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.