Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Juvia's Place/The Masquerade (2019 formulation)
The Masquerade (2019 formulation)
Juvia's Place

The Masquerade (2019 formulation)

Eye Shadow

Juvia's Place

The Masquerade (2019 formulation)

Eye Shadow

hover a pillar to set the scene →

Your composite

76OUT OF 100Good

range 74–84

—
Eco
—
Labor
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

1880 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 20-point gap between the two loudest voices.

65IARC MonographsGovernment
vs
85Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
050100

Cleaner options

See 1880 cleaner alternatives

Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

20 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    3 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    How we know the packaging

    Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.

    A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Fair·7 of 14 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 7 of 14 listed ingredients; 7 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (1)

    • Talc6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

      IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (6)

    • Mica
    • kaolin
    • Ethylhexyl Palmitate
    • iron oxides
    • ultramarines
    • Ferric Ferrocyanide

    No data in our sources (7)

    • Magnesuim strearate
    • Chromium Hydroxide Green
    • Magnese violet
    • FD&C Red 40 Al Lake
    • FD&C Blue 1 Al lake
    • Yellow 5 Al lake
    • May contain : Mica and Titanium Dioxide

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.