Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Nucolor/Lippop Moisturizing Lip Balm, Orange Scent (2019 formulation)
Lippop Moisturizing Lip Balm, Orange Scent (2019 formulation)
Nucolor

Lippop Moisturizing Lip Balm, Orange Scent (2019 formulation)

Lip Balm
Grapefruit & Currant Thinkdaily Lip Balm

Cleaner pick · Safest lip care we have rated

Thinkbaby

Grapefruit & Currant Thinkdaily Lip Balm

+45 on ingredient safety

$3.49

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 1864 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

55OUT OF 100Fair

Ingredient safety only

range 42–88

55▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

46-point split

62

Scan

42

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

1864 found

See better →

Flagged

5 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 46-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
88Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 1864 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

46 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · IARC Monographs

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    4 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·26 of 26 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 26 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (5)

    • ETHYLHEXYL METHOXYCINNAMATE7/10uv filter · uv absorber · light stabilizerraters disagree

      Endocrine-active · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • ISOSTEARIC ACID MAY CONTAIN: FRAGRANCE6/10raters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • FD&C YELLOW 54/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • RED 7 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (21)

    • PARAFFIN
    • ETHYLHEXYL PALMITATE
    • HYDROGENATED POLYISOBUTENE
    • POLYISOBUTENE
    • HYDROGENATED COCONUT OIL
    • DIGLYCERYL ADIPATE/CAPRATE/CAPRYLATE/ HYDROXYSTEARATE/ISOSTEARATE/STEARATE
    • MONTAN WAX
    • OZOKERITE
    • HYDROGENATED VEGETABLE OIL
    • MICROCRYSTALLINE WAX
    • BEESWAX
    • COPERNICIA CERIFERA WAX
    • STEARYL STEARATE
    • HYDROGENATED PALMACID
    • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
    • TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
    • LECITHIN
    • POLYHYDROXYSTEARIC ACID
    • POLYGLYCERYL3 POLYRICINOLEATE
    • ISOPROPYL MYRISTATEcomedogenic in testing
    • IRON OXIDES
    What these ingredient tags mean (1)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • comedogenic in testingISOPROPYL MYRISTATE

      • ISOPROPYL MYRISTATE: A light emollient, and the ester the rabbit-ear literature names first. Fulton JE Jr, Pay SR, Fulton JE 3rd, "Comedogenicity of current therapeutic products, cosmetics, and ingredients in the rabbit ear", J Am Acad Dermatol 1984;10(1):96-105, PMID 6229554. The openly readable abstract names this ingredient among its "ingredient offenders", in prose and without a numeric rating: "Ingredient offenders include isopropyl myristate and its analogs, such as isopropyl palmitate, isopropyl isostearate, butyl stearate, isostearyl neopentanoate, myristyl myristate..." The rabbit-ear assay rates raw ingredients and does not predict how a finished formula behaves on human skin.