L.A. Colors
Highlighter Set, 4 colors, glowtastic
2020 formulationBronzer Highlighter
Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated
Tarte
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick+73 on ingredient safety
$38
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated
Tarte
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick+73 on ingredient safety
$38
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Cleaner options
18444 found
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 77-point gap between the two loudest voices.
All 18444 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates L.A. Colors as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Robust11 of 12 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 11 of 12 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (5)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (6)
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.
rich occlusiveDIMETHICONE
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.
Endocrine-activeflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
Endocrine-activeflagged by 4 of 9 lists →
Endocrine-activeflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →