L.A. Girl
Soft Matte Cream Blush, Rosebud Gbl441
Blush$8 MSRPGTIN 081555964405
Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated
Tarte
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick+51 on ingredient safety, gives up 11 on labor practices
$38
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 50-point gap between the two loudest voices.
40ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 14949 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
50 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs · ECHA SVHC Candidate List
Environmental
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust25 of 26 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 25 of 26 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (10)
Endocrine-activeflagged by 3 of 9 lists
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 2 of 9 lists
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (15)
- ISOHEXADECANE
- HYDROGENATED MICROCRYSTALLINE CERA
- ISODODECANE
- BIS-DIGLYCERYL POLYACYLADIPATE-2
- POLYISOBUTENE
- DISTEARDIMONIUM HECTORITE
- SILICA
- PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRAISOSTEARATE
- MICA
- PROPYLENE CARBONATE
- VINYL DIMETHICONE/ METHICONE SILSESQUIOXANE CROSSPOLYMER
- SIMMONDSIA CHINENSIS SEED OIL
- TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
- TIN OXIDE
- IRON OXIDES
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.