Black Radiance
Perfect Tone Matte Lip Creme, 5417 Mod Cougar
uncategorized
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 23-point gap between the two loudest voices.
65ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs88Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientEvery rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
23 pts apartA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
Environmental
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Labor
raters agreeRun by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Black Radiance as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
9 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Good26 of 33 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 26 of 33 listed ingredients; 7 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (6)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists →
Persistent / bioaccumulativeflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (20)
- ISODODECANE
- CETYL ETHYLHEXANOATE
- TRIMETHYLSILOXYSILICATE
- HYDROGENATED POLYCYCLOPENTADIENE
- QUATERNIUM-90 BENTONITE
- POLYMETHYLSILSESQUIOXANE
- METHOXY PEG-17/METHOXY PEG-11/HDI ISOCYANURATE TRIMER CROSSPOLYMER
- TRIACONTANYL PVP
- PROPYLENE CARBONATE
- OCTYLDODECANOL
- DIPENTAERYTHRITYL HEXA C5-9 ACID ESTERS
- VP/EICOSENE COPOLYMER
- ASTROCARYUM MURUMURU SEED BUTTER
- PHYTOSTERYL MACADAMIATE
- SORBIC ACID
- TOCOPHEROL
- GLYCINE SOJA OIL
- CI 77492
- CI 77499
- MICA
No data in our sources (7)
- SILICA DIMETHYL SILYATE
- COPERNICIA CERIFERA CARNAUBA WAX/CIRE DE CARNAUBA
- IRON OXIDES/CL 77491
- RED 28 LAKE/CI 45410
- RED 6/CI 15850
- RED 7 LAKE/CI 15850
- YELLOW 6 LAKE/CI 15985)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.