Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Natasha Denona/All Over Glow, Light
All Over Glow, Light
Natasha Denona

All Over Glow, Light

Facial Powder
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+65 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 14807 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

35OUT OF 100Horrible

Ingredient safety only

range 15–90

35▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

61-point split

48

Scan

15

Precautionary

76

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

14807 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 75-point gap between the two loudest voices.

15Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
90EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 14807 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

75 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    9 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·38 of 42 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 38 of 42 listed ingredients; 4 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (8)

    • Retinyl Palmitate9/10skin conditioningraters disagree

      Carcinogen-linked · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • CI 778918/10colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • Titanium Dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • Parfum [Fragrance6/10perfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Propyl Gallate6/10perfuming · antioxidantraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Talc6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

      IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • Cyclopentasiloxane4/10emollient · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

      Persistent / bioaccumulative · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Citric Acid4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (30)

    • Octyldodecyl Stearoyl Stearate
    • Dicalcium Phosphate Dihydrate
    • Mica
    • Cetearyl Ethylhexanoate
    • Cetearyl Isononanoate
    • Hydrogenated Polyisobutene
    • Ozokerite
    • Cera Microcristallina
    • Microcrystalline Wax
    • Sorbitan Sesquioleate
    • Candelilla Cera
    • Silica
    • Diisostearyl Malate
    • Polyglyceryl-3 Diisostearate
    • Silica Dimethyl Silylate
    • Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride
    • Tocopheryl Acetate
    • Tocopherol
    • CI 77491
    • CI 77492
    • CI 77499 [Iron Oxides
    • CI 75470 [Carmine
    • CI 77510 [Ferric Ferrocyanide
    • CI 77742 [Manganese Violet
    • CI 77007 [Ultramarines
    • Bismuth Oxychloride
    • Magnesium Stearate
    • Synthetic Fluorphlogopite
    • Calcium Sodium Borosilicate
    • Tin Oxide

    No data in our sources (4)

    • May Contain
    • CI 42090 [FD&C Blue No1
    • CI 19140 [FD&C Yellow No.5
    • CI 16035 [FD&C Red No.40

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.