Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Aussie/Headstrong Volume Hairspray, Bamboo and Kakadu Plum
Headstrong Volume Hairspray, Bamboo and Kakadu Plum
Aussie · owned by Procter & Gamble Norge AS

Headstrong Volume Hairspray, Bamboo and Kakadu Plum

Hair Spray
Curl Freeze Lash Styling Gel

Cleaner pick · Safest styling we have rated

Catrice Cosmetics

Curl Freeze Lash Styling Gel

+64 on ingredient safety

$7

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 4320 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

65OUT OF 100Fair

range 52–85

36▲▼ split
Safety
86
Eco
72▲▼ split
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

27-point split

15

Scan

42

Precautionary

25

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

4320 found

See better →

Flagged

6 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 67-point gap between the two loudest voices.

15Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
82IARC MonographsGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 4320 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

67 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

33 pts apart
  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Aussie as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

10 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·16 of 16 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 16 listed ingredients.

Worth a look (6)

  • Cyclohexylamine9/10anticorrosive · bufferingraters disagree

    EU-prohibited · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

  • Alcohol Denat6/10commonly dryingfragrance · antimicrobial · antifoamingraters disagree

    ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Fragrance6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfumingraters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

  • Acrylates Copolymer4/10film forming · antistatic · bindingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Cyclopentasiloxane4/10emollient · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

    Persistent / bioaccumulative · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

  • Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Extract4/10humectant · emollient · oral careraters disagree

    IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

✓No flags in our sources (10)

  • Water
  • Dimethyl Ether
  • Va/Crotonates/Vinyl Neodecanoate Copolymer
  • Aminomethyl Propanol
  • Glycereth-7 Triacetate
  • Ammonium Benzoate
  • Peg-8 Dimethicone
  • Acetamide Mea
  • Ecklonia Radiata Extract
  • Simmondsia Chinensis Seed Oil
What these ingredient tags mean (2)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

  • commonly dryingAlcohol Denat

    • Alcohol Denat: Denatured ethanol: a fast-evaporating solvent that thins a formula and leaves a dry finish. International Chemical Safety Card ICSC 0044, Ethanol (anhydrous), prepared by an international group of experts for the ILO and WHO: "The substance defats the skin, which may cause dryness or cracking." WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care (2009) records depletion of the skin lipid barrier by lipid-dissolving alcohols, and also that "the lipid-dissolving effect of alcohols is inversely related to their concentration". Both describe stronger exposures than a cosmetic formula.
  • undeclared fragrance blendFragrance

    • Fragrance: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.