Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Profusion/Cosmetics Bling It On Glitter Liquid Eyeliner, Wise Sapphire
Cosmetics Bling It On Glitter Liquid Eyeliner, Wise Sapphire
Profusion

Cosmetics Bling It On Glitter Liquid Eyeliner, Wise Sapphire

Eye Linertypically under $12

Your composite

82OUT OF 100Good

No safety data

range 82–83

—
Safety
78
Eco
87
Labor
—
Pkg
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

Nothing beats this on safety.

Flagged

2 ingredients

What's flagged →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

    Environmental

    • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Labor

    raters agree
    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Profusion as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    3 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    Ingredient safetyno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Not enough to score·5 of 9 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 5 of 9 listed ingredients; 4 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill. That is not enough of the label for a safety score to be honest, so we do not publish one.

    Worth a look (1)

    • Polyethylene Terephthalate4/10film formingraters disagree

      EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (4)

    • Aqua
    • Mica
    • Glycerolhumectant
    • Phenoxyethanol

    No data in our sources (4)

    • Carbomer ,2-Amino-2-methyl-1-propanol
    • Polyurethane Coating
    • MAY CONTAIN: FD\u0026C Red 40 Al Lake
    • FD\u0026C Yellow 5 Al Lake

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (1)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • humectantGlycerol

      • Glycerol: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.