Redken
Blondage Conditioner, Violet pigment
Conditioner
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
Finding shown, score not counted — partial label
- ANSES Endocrine Disruptors flagged an ingredient
- EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) flagged an ingredient
- Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist flagged an ingredient
This finding stands: the ingredient it names really is on the list we hold. Its 0-100 score does not count toward the pillar, because we only hold part of this label, and a partial list can only ever score too generously.
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs
Environmental
Finding shown, score not counted — partial label
This finding stands: the ingredient it names really is on the list we hold. Its 0-100 score does not count toward the pillar, because we only hold part of this label, and a partial list can only ever score too generously.
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Redken as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
1 rating · 1 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
Ingredient safetyno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Partial list30 shown
Only part of this product's ingredient list could be read from its source, so what is shown here is incomplete. We do not publish a safety score from a partial list.
Worth a look (7)
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Health Canada Hotlist — restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (22)
- AQUA / WATER / EAU
- CETEARYL ALCOHOL
- PROPYLENE GLYCOLcommon irritant
- ETHANOLAMINE
- BEHENTRIMONIUM METHOSULFATE
- STEARAMIDOPROPYL DIMETHYLAMINE
- GLYCERINhumectant
- HYDROXYETHYLCELLULOSE
- QUATERNIUM-91
- POLYQUATERNIUM-37
- BENZOIC ACID
- PARAFFINUM LIQUIDUM / MINERAL OIL
- CETRIMONIUM METHOSULFATE
- SODIUM COCOYL AMINO ACIDS
- POTASSIUM DIMETHICONE PEG-7 PANTHENYL PHOSPHATE
- PPG-1 TRIDECETH-6
- SODIUM SARCOSINATE
- ARGININE
- HYDROLYZED SOY PROTEIN
- HYDROLYZED VEGETABLE PROTEIN PG-PROPYL SILANETRIOL
- TETRASODIUM EDTA
- POTASSIUM SORBATE
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
What these ingredient tags mean (3)
These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.
common irritantPROPYLENE GLYCOL
- PROPYLENE GLYCOL: A solvent that shows up in patch-test clinics, more often as irritation than as allergy. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2018 (Jacob SE, Scheman A, McGowan MA, Dermatitis 2018;29(1):3-5).
undeclared fragrance blendPARFUM / FRAGRANCE
- PARFUM / FRAGRANCE: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.
humectantGLYCERIN
- GLYCERIN: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.