Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/PUR/4-in-1 Correcting Primer, Energize & Rescue (2020 formulation)
4-in-1 Correcting Primer, Energize & Rescue (2020 formulation)
PUR

4-in-1 Correcting Primer, Energize & Rescue (2020 formulation)

Primer
TG

Cleaner pick · Safest multi-function face we have rated

The Good Mineral

Loves You Back 3 in 1 Foundation Powder, Coco 6

+26 on ingredient safety

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 89 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

74OUT OF 100Good

Ingredient safety only

range 65–98

74▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

11-point split

87

Scan

98

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

89 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 33-point gap between the two loudest voices.

65California Proposition 65Government
vs
98Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 89 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

33 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·37 of 39 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 37 of 39 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (6)

    • Retinol8/10skin conditioningraters disagree

      Prop 65-listed · flagged by 4 of 9 lists

    • Caffeine6/10perfuming · skin conditioningraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice4/10skin conditioningraters disagree

      IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Lactic Acid4/10humectant · buffering · skin conditioningraters disagree

      Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Jasminum Officinale Flower/Leaf Extract4/10perfuming · fragrance · moisturisingraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (31)

    • Aqua
    • Ceteareth-6 Olivate
    • Coconut Alkanes
    • Neopentyl Glycol Dicaprylate/Dicaprate
    • Hydrogenated Olive Oil
    • Propanediol
    • Squalane
    • Cocos Nucifera Water
    • Cocos Nucifera Fruit Juice
    • Lactobacillus/Amaranth/Ferment
    • Glycyrrhiza Uralensis Root Extract
    • Ceramide AP
    • Butyrospermum Parkii Butter
    • Sodium Starch Octenylsuccinate
    • Glycerin
    • Polyacrylate Crosspolymer-6
    • Coco-Caprylate/Caprate
    • Olea Europaea Fruit Oil
    • Trisodium Ethylenediamine Disuccinate
    • Olea Europaea Oil Unsaponifiables
    • Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride
    • Ananas Sativus Fruit Extract
    • Coffea Arabica Leaf/Seed Extract
    • Dipteryx Odorata Seed Extract
    • Cocos Nucifera Fruit Extract
    • Prunus Armeniaca Fruit Extract
    • Cucumis Melo Cantalupensis Fruit Extract
    • Vanilla Planifolia Fruit Extract
    • Hexylene Glycol
    • Caprylyl Glycol
    • Potassium Sorbate

    No data in our sources (2)

    • Citrus Aurantium Dulcis Extract
    • Sodium Benozate

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.