Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Smackers/Water Based Nail Polish (2020 formulation)
Water Based Nail Polish (2020 formulation)
Smackers

Water Based Nail Polish (2020 formulation)

Nail Polish
Nail Polish Remover Acetone free, Lavender

Cleaner pick · Safest nails we have rated

Daylogic

Nail Polish Remover Acetone free, Lavender

+74 on ingredient safety, gives up 58 on labor practices

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 2756 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

55OUT OF 100Poor

range 46–77

26▲▼ split
Safety
50
Eco
88
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

93-point split

0

Scan

93

Precautionary

20

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

2756 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 93-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
93Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 2756 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

93 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

✓US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 54% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·23 of 24 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 23 of 24 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (10)

  • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • RED 48/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • POLYURETHANE-354/10bindingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE4/10film formingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • ACRYLATES COPOLYMER4/10film forming · antistatic · bindingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • BLUE 14/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • RED 284/10cosmetic colorant · pigmentraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • RED 334/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • YELLOW 54/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (13)

  • WATER/EAU
  • POLYVINYL ALCOHOL
  • PEG-400
  • PROPANEDIOL
  • CELLULOSE
  • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
  • CAPRYLHYDROXAMIC ACID
  • TRISODIUM EDTA
  • SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
  • ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
  • HEXYLENE GLYCOL
  • XANTHAN GUM
  • CELLULOSE GUM

No data in our sources (1)

  • MAY CONTAIN/PEUT CONTENIR: MICA

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.