Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Catrice Cosmetics/HD Liquid Coverage Foundation, 030 Sand (2019 formulation)
Catrice Cosmetics

HD Liquid Coverage Foundation, 030 Sand (2019 formulation)

uncategorizedtypically under $12
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+47 on ingredient safety, gives up 18 on labor practices

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 14532 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

67OUT OF 100Fair

range 63–79

53▲▼ split
Safety
56
Eco
92
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

46-point split

62

Scan

42

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

14532 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 46-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
88Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 14532 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

46 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Catrice Cosmetics as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

8 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·29 of 29 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 29 listed ingredients.

Worth a look (6)

  • CI 778918/10colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • TALC6/10abrasive · absorbent · anticakingraters disagree

    IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A) · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • PARFUM6/10perfuming · fragranceraters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • POLYPROPYLENE4/10viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • NYLON-124/10opacifying · bulking · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (23)

  • AQUA
  • DIMETHICONE
  • PEG-10 DIMETHICONE
  • TRIMETHYLSILOXYSILICATE
  • ISODODECANE
  • CETYL PEG/PPG-10/1 DIMETHICONE
  • HDI/TRIMETHYLOL HEXYLLACTONE CROSSPOLYMER
  • SODIUM CHLORIDE
  • HYDROGEN DIMETHICONE
  • GLYCERIN
  • MAGNESIUM SULFATE
  • DISTEARDIMONIUM HECTORITE
  • METHICONE
  • ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
  • SILICA
  • ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE
  • PROPYLENE CARBONATE
  • DEHYDROACETIC ACID
  • SODIUM DEHYDROACETATE
  • BENZOIC ACID
  • CI 77491
  • CI 77492
  • CI 77499