Anastasia Beverly Hills
Eye Shadow Singles, Golden Copper (2019 formulation)
Eye Shadowtypically $12–30
hover a pillar to set the scene →
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 30-point gap between the two loudest voices.
64IARC MonographsGovernment
vs94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientCleaner options
See 2788 cleaner alternatives
Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
2 are in this product's price band or under
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
30 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
Environmental
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust29 of 30 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 29 of 30 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (5)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Persistent / bioaccumulativeflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)flagged by 1 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (24)
- Synthetic Fluorphlogopite
- Dimethicone
- Aluminum Calcium Sodium Silicate
- Boron Nitride
- Zinc Stearate
- Silica
- Octyldodecyl Stearoyl Stearate
- Polymethylsilsesquioxane
- Zea Mays Starch
- Zinc Myristate
- Glycerin
- Vinyl Dimethicone/Methicone Silsesquioxane Crosspolymer
- Caprylyl Glycol
- Hydrogenated Lecithin
- Isopentyldiol
- Lauroyl Lysine
- Mineral Oil/Paraffinum Liquidum/Huile Minerale
- Polysilicone-11
- Sodium Polyacrylate
- Theobroma Cacao Seed Butter
- Tin Oxide
- Tocopherol
- May Contain: Mica
- Iron Oxides
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.