Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Bobbi Brown/EXTRA LIP TINT, Bare Pink
EXTRA LIP TINT, Bare Pink
Bobbi Brown

EXTRA LIP TINT, Bare Pink

uncategorized

Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated

VMV Hypoallergenics

Velvet Matte Lipstick

+83 on ingredient safety

$14

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 12508 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

42OUT OF 100Poor

range 36–63

17▲▼ split
Safety
78
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

42-point split

0

Scan

42

Precautionary

0

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

12508 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 82-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
82IARC MonographsGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 12508 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

82 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Bobbi Brown as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

8 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·46 of 49 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 46 of 49 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (19)

  • Titanium Dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • Red 218/10raters disagree

    EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Orange 58/10raters disagree

    EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Red 22 Lake8/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Red 30 Lake8/10raters disagree

    EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Citral7/10fragrance materialperfuming · flavouringraters disagree

    ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

  • Limonene7/10fragrance materialperfuming · deodorant · solventraters disagree

    ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

  • Sorbitan Oleate6/10surfactant - emulsifyingraters disagree

    ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • Linalool6/10fragrance materialperfuming · deodorantraters disagree

    EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Fragrance6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfumingraters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Polyethylene4/10film forming · abrasive · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • Red 7 Lake4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Red 28 Lake4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Blue 1 Lake4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Red 274/10raters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Red 74/10colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Red 64/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Red 33 Lake4/10raters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Yellow 5 Lake4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (27)

  • Hydrogenated Polyisobutene
  • Phytosteryl/Isostearyl/Cetyl/Stearyl/Behenyl Dimer Dilinoleate
  • Polyglyceryl-10 Decaisostearate
  • Phytosteryl/Octyldodecyl Lauroyl Glutamate
  • Synthetic Wax
  • Cetearyl Alcohol
  • Octyldodecanol
  • Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride
  • Octyldodecyl Neopentanoate
  • Theobroma Cacao Seed Butterrich occlusive
  • Orbignya Oleifera Seed Oil
  • Simmondsia Chinensis Seed Oil
  • Persea Gratissima Oil
  • Olea Europaea Fruit Oil
  • Squalane
  • Olea Europaea Oil Unsaponifiables
  • Ethylene/Propylene Copolymer
  • Hydrogenated Olive Oil
  • Tocopheryl Acetate
  • Ascorbyl Palmitate
  • Tocopherol
  • Pentaerythrityl Tetra-Di-T-Butyl Hydroxyhydrocinnamate
  • Mica
  • Iron Oxides
  • Yellow 6 Lake
  • Bismuth Oxychloride
  • Manganese Violet

No data in our sources (3)

  • Microcrystalline WaxCera MicrocristallinaCire Microcristalline
  • Bronze Powder
  • Copper Powder

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (3)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

  • fragrance materialLinalool, Citral, Limonene

    • Linalool: A floral fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 84: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
    • Citral: A lemon-scented fragrance component named separately on the label; the one name covers three related substances. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 70: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk. As replaced by Commission Regulation (EU) 2026/909 of 27 April 2026, the entry is a GROUPED one covering citral, geranial and neral, declared collectively as "Citral", with per-product-type caps from 0,032% in deodorant to 1,2% in rinse-off and leave-on hair products. Its three substances carry two different sell-through dates: products not complying may not be placed on the Union market from 1 January 2027 in every case, and may not be made available from 1 July 2028 for citral, footnote (**), or from 1 August 2028 for geranial and neral, footnote (***). In the consolidated text those two footnotes are renumbered (46) and (47); both are worded "these substances", where the footnotes that attach to a single named substance say "that substance".
    • Limonene: A citrus-smelling fragrance component named separately on the label; the one name covers three related isomers. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 88: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk. That entry carries transition footnote (37): stock that does not comply, lawfully placed on the Union market before the 31 July 2026 cut-off, may still be made available until 31 July 2028. It is marked on the racemic dl-limonene/Dipentene line and the (S)-(l-limonene) line, but NOT the (R)-p-mentha-1,8-diene (d-limonene) line, CAS 5989-27-5, whose duty was already running as entry 88 before Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/1545 and so needed no transition. All three isomers are declared under the single glossary name "Limonene", so that name on a label does not identify which of them is present.
  • undeclared fragrance blendFragrance

    • Fragrance: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.
  • rich occlusiveTheobroma Cacao Seed Butter

    • Theobroma Cacao Seed Butter: A rich butter the FDA recognises by name as a skin protectant. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(d): "Cocoa butter, 50 to 100 percent."

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.