Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Flower/In Your Prime, Perfecting Primer (2019 formulation)
In Your Prime, Perfecting Primer (2019 formulation)
Flower

In Your Prime, Perfecting Primer (2019 formulation)

Primer
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+64 on ingredient safety, gives up 11 on labor practices

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 16656 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

66OUT OF 100Fair

range 56–84

36▲▼ split
Safety
78
Eco
85
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

82-point split

56

Scan

6

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

16656 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 82-point gap between the two loudest voices.

6Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
88Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 16656 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

82 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · IARC Monographs · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Flower as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

9 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·29 of 30 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 29 of 30 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (7)

  • Retinyl Palmitate9/10skin conditioningraters disagree

    Carcinogen-linked · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • Bht7/10fragrance · antioxidantraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

  • Fragrance [Parfum6/10perfumingraters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • Cyclopentasiloxane4/10emollient · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

    Persistent / bioaccumulative · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • Nylon-124/10opacifying · bulking · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • Sodium Hydroxide4/10buffering · denaturantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (22)

  • Dimethicone
  • Polysilicone-11
  • Butylene Glycol
  • Squalane
  • Silica
  • Isononyl Isononanoate
  • Hydroxyethyl Acrylate/Sodium Acryloyldimethyl Taurate Copolymer
  • Ethylhexylglycerin
  • Isohexadecane
  • Peg-10 Dimethicone
  • Tocopheryl Acetate
  • C10-18 Triglycerides
  • Polysorbate 60
  • Polysorbate 40
  • Glycerin
  • Disodium Edta
  • Ammonium Polyacryloyldimethyl Taurate
  • Helianthus Annuus Seed Oil
  • Biosaccharide Gum-1
  • Sorbitan Isostearate
  • Gossypium Herbaceum Seed Extract
  • Hypericum Perforatum Extract

No data in our sources (1)

  • Water [Eau

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.