Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/OFRA/Cosmetics Corrector Tri-Pot, Lite, Beige Medium, Amber (2019 formulation)
Cosmetics Corrector Tri-Pot, Lite, Beige Medium, Amber (2019 formulation)
OFRA

Cosmetics Corrector Tri-Pot, Lite, Beige Medium, Amber (2019 formulation)

Concealertypically $12–30
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+60 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 16416 cleaner options →6 in this price band or under

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

64OUT OF 100Fair

range 57–82

40▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
88
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

51-point split

48

Scan

25

Precautionary

76

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

16416 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 51-point gap between the two loudest voices.

25Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
76Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 16416 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

51 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·15 of 22 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 15 of 22 listed ingredients; 7 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (6)

    • BHA10/10fragrance · antioxidantraters disagree

      Carcinogen-linked · flagged by 6 of 9 lists

    • May Contain: Cl 778918/10raters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Cl 191404/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Cl 420904/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Cl 158504/10raters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (9)

    • Bis-Diglyceryl Polyacyladipate-2
    • Beeswax
    • Caprylic/Capric
    • Triglyceride
    • Polybutene
    • Microcrystalline wax
    • Candelilla
    • Cl 77007
    • Cl 77742

    No data in our sources (7)

    • Glycine Soya oil
    • Octyldodecyl StearoyI Stearate
    • Copernicia Cerifera
    • DL-Alpha-Tocopheryl
    • Acetate
    • Retinyl Pa Imitate
    • Cl 77491/77492/77499

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.