Mario Badescu Skin Care
Mario Badescu Seaweed Cleansing Soap
uncategorized
Cleaner pick · Safest wash & scrub we have rated
Africology Skincare & Spa
Bio Therapy Body Wash+87 on ingredient safety
250ml · 60 ZAR · 24 ZAR/100 ml
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 80-point gap between the two loudest voices.
0Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs80EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 9963 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
80 pts apartA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · IARC Monographs · California Proposition 65 · ECHA SVHC Candidate List
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Coverage & match quality
5 ratings · 1 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Laborno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Good13 of 16 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 13 of 16 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (6)
Carcinogen-linkedflagged by 4 of 9 lists →
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
Carcinogen-linkedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Endocrine-activeflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
Endocrine-activeflagged by 4 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (7)
No data in our sources (3)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
What these ingredient tags mean (1)
These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.
common irritantPropylene Glycol, Quaternium-15, Imidazolidinyl Urea
- Propylene Glycol: A solvent that shows up in patch-test clinics, more often as irritation than as allergy. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2018 (Jacob SE, Scheman A, McGowan MA, Dermatitis 2018;29(1):3-5).
- Quaternium-15: A preservative the EU no longer permits in cosmetics; the ban followed a reproductive-toxicity classification and a finding that its safety could not be established. Prohibited in cosmetics by EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex II entry 1386 (cis-1-(3-chlorallyl)-3,5,7-triaza-1-azoniaadamantane chloride, quaternium-15, CAS 51229-78-8), inserted by Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/831, which simultaneously deleted its Annex V entry 31 permitting it as a preservative. Recital 6 of that Regulation gives TWO grounds, not one: the cis-isomer "has been classified as a CMR substance of category 2", AND the SCCS opinion of 13 to 14 December 2011 concluded that "on the basis of the available data the safety of Quaternium-15 for use in cosmetic products cannot be established". The underlying classification is Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 (CLP) Annex VI index 612-251-00-9, inserted by Commission Regulation (EC) 790/2009: Flam. Sol. 2, Repr. 2 (H361d, "suspected of damaging the unborn child"), Acute Tox. 4, Skin Irrit. 2 (H315), Skin Sens. 1 (H317) and Aquatic Chronic 2. That entry carries no carcinogenicity classification of any kind. Skin Sens. 1 and Skin Irrit. 2 in the same entry are the harmonised classification behind this row's tag, so the tag rests on a sensitisation finding rather than on the reproductive-toxicity ground for the ban.
- Imidazolidinyl Urea: A preservative the FDA lists as a formaldehyde releaser, so formaldehyde-reactive skin can notice it. How much reaches the skin depends on the whole formula, not on this name alone. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex V entry 27, permits imidazolidinyl urea as a preservative up to 0,6%. The FDA names it among the "formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasing ingredients" on its Allergens in Cosmetics page (content current 25 February 2022). Annex V preamble point 2, as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/1181, requires the warning "releases formaldehyde" on any product whose total released formaldehyde exceeds 0,001% (10 ppm). That Regulation states the sensitisation ground itself, so the chain is drawn by the regulator and not by us: recital (2) names the class, "Certain of those preservatives are gradually releasing formaldehyde in order to fulfil a preserving function in the final cosmetic product (so called formaldehyde releasers)", and recital (3) gives the purpose of the warning, "In order to inform consumers sensitised to formaldehyde about the presence of formaldehyde that may trigger an allergic reaction". Recital (1) records that formaldehyde is classified a skin sensitizer (Category 1) in Part 3 of Annex VI to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008.