Profusion
Cosmetics 9 Shade Palette, Property of Karen Smith
Eye Shadow
hover a pillar to set the scene →
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 41-point gap between the two loudest voices.
47IARC MonographsGovernment
vs88Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientCleaner options
See 2103 cleaner alternatives
Same category, all safer. We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
41 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens
Environmental
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Good33 of 41 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 33 of 41 listed ingredients; 8 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (6)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists
IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A)flagged by 5 of 9 lists
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (27)
- MICA
- SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
- MAGNESIUM STEARATE
- DIMETHICONE
- SILICA
- TRIDECYL TRIMELLITATE
- PHENYL TRIMETHICONE
- CALCIUM ALUMINUM BOROSILICATE
- ETHYLHEXYL PALMITATE
- CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE
- HYDROGENATED POLYISOBUTENE
- C12-15 ALKYL BENZOATE
- POLYISOBUTENE
- ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
- CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
- BORON NITRIDE
- MICROCRYSTALLINE WAX
- VINYL DIMETHICONE/ METHICONE SILSESQUIOXANE CROSSPOLYMER
- BUTYLENE/ETHYLENE/ STYRENE COPOLYMER
- TIN OXIDE
- TRIETHOXYCAPRYLYLSILANE
- HYDROXYSTEARIC ACID
- TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
- IRON OXIDE RED
- IRON OXIDE YELLOW
- IRON OXIDE BLACK
- MANGANESE VIOLET
No data in our sources (8)
- ALUMINUM
- FD&C RED NO.40 ALUMINUM LAKE
- FD&C YELLOW NO.5 ALUMINIUM LAKE
- D&C RED NO.6 BARIUM LAKE
- D&C RED NO.7 CALCIUM LAKE
- FD&C BLUE NO.1 AL LAKE
- D&C BLACK NO.2
- FD&C YELLOW NO.6 ALUMINIUM LAKE
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.