Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/OFRA/Cosmetics Soft Pearl Peel (2019 formulation)
Cosmetics Soft Pearl Peel (2019 formulation)
OFRA

Cosmetics Soft Pearl Peel (2019 formulation)

uncategorizedtypically $12–30

Your composite

55OUT OF 100Poor

range 52–65

21▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
88
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

27-point split

15

Scan

42

Precautionary

25

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No fair cohort on file, so no comparison.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 27-point gap between the two loudest voices.

15Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

27 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · IARC Monographs · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65

✓US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 56% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    4 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·14 of 18 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 14 of 18 listed ingredients; 4 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (3)

    • FD&C Green #38/10raters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Fragrance6/10perfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (11)

    • Deionized Water
    • Stearic Acid
    • Propylene Glycol
    • Glycerin
    • Caprylic / Capric Triglyceride
    • Isopropyl Myristate
    • Cetyl Alcohol
    • PEG 40 stearate
    • Xanthan Gum
    • Caprylyl Glycol
    • Hexylene Glycol

    No data in our sources (4)

    • Apricot Seed Powder
    • Mica & Titanium Dioxide
    • Dimethicone 350
    • TEA 99

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.