Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Luster's Pink/Spritz Design Control Formula for Flexible Touchable Hold
Spritz Design Control Formula for Flexible Touchable Hold
Luster's Pink

Spritz Design Control Formula for Flexible Touchable Hold

Hair Products For People Of Color
Curl Freeze Lash Styling Gel

Cleaner pick · Safest styling we have rated

Catrice Cosmetics

Curl Freeze Lash Styling Gel

+86 on ingredient safety

$7

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 5343 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

14OUT OF 100Horrible

Ingredient safety only

range 0–85

14▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

25-point split

0

Scan

25

Precautionary

0

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

5343 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 85-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
vs
85Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 5343 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

85 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: IARC Monographs · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·19 of 20 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 19 of 20 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (11)

    • Isobutane9/10propellantraters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • C10-12 Alkane/ Cycloalkane9/10solventraters disagree

      EU-prohibited · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • Retinyl Palmitate9/10skin conditioningraters disagree

      Carcinogen-linked · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • Ethylhexyl Dimethyl PABA8/10uv filter · uv absorber · light stabilizerraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Benzyl Salicylate7/10uv absorber · perfumingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

    • Fragrance6/10perfumingraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Benzyl Alcohol6/10preservative · perfuming · solventraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Hexyl Cinnamal6/10perfumingraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Geraniol6/10perfuming · tonicraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Linalool6/10perfuming · deodorantraters disagree

      EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Alpha-Isomethyl Ionone4/10perfuming · skin conditioningraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (8)

    • Mineral Oil
    • Propane
    • Hydrogenated Polyisobutene
    • Paraffin
    • C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate
    • Octyldodecyl Myristate
    • Tocopherol
    • Corn Oil

    No data in our sources (1)

    • Shea Butter Extract

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.